A few days ago I started to read a book about testing: Agile Testing: A Practical Guide for Testers and Agile Teams.
The book is in the top 10, best books about testing, it is written by Lisa Crispin and Janet Gregory, testers with extensive experience in both traditional as well as agile projects, in large or small teams.
Below is an excerpt from the book that you might find interesting:
"WHAT DO WE MEAN BY AGILE TESTING?
You might have noticed that we use the term “tester” to describe a person whose main activities revolve around testing and quality assurance. You’ll also see that we often use the word “programmer” to describe a person whose main activities revolve around writing production code. We don’t intend that these terms sound narrow or insignificant. Programmers do more than turn
a specification into a program. We don’t call them “developers,” because everyone involved in delivering software is a developer. Testers do more than perform “testing tasks.” Each agile team member is focused on delivering a high-quality product that provides business value. Agile testers work to ensure that their team delivers the quality their customers need. We use the terms “programmer” and “tester” for convenience."
"WHOLE-TEAM APPROACH
One of the biggest differences in agile development versus traditional development is the agile “whole-team” approach. With agile, it’s not only the testers or a quality assurance team who feel responsible for quality. We don’t think of “departments,” we just think of the skills and resources we need to deliver the best possible product. The focus of agile development is producing highquality
software in a time frame that maximizes its value to the business. This is the job of the whole team, not just testers or designated quality assurance professionals. Everyone on an agile team gets “test-infected.” Tests, from the unit level on up, drive the coding, help the team learn how the application
should work, and let us know when we’re “done” with a task or story. An agile team must possess all the skills needed to produce quality code that delivers the features required by the organization. While this might mean including specialists on the team, such as expert testers, it doesn’t limit particular tasks to particular team members. Any task might be completed by any team member, or a pair of team members. This means that the team takes responsibility for all kinds of testing tasks, such as automating tests and manual exploratory testing. It also means that the whole team thinks constantly about designing code for testability. The whole-team approach involves constant collaboration. Testers collaborate with programmers, the customer team, and other team specialists—and not just for testing tasks, but other tasks related to testing, such as building infrastructure and designing for testability.
The whole-team approach means everyone takes responsibility for testing tasks. It means team members have a range of skill sets and experience to employ in attacking challenges such as designing for testability by turning examples into tests and into code to make those tests pass. These diverse viewpoints can only mean better tests and test coverage.
Most importantly, on an agile team, anyone can ask for and receive help. The team commits to providing the highest possible business value as a team, and the team does whatever is needed to deliver it. Some folks who are new to agile perceive it as all about speed. The fact is, it’s all about quality—and if it’s not, we question whether it’s really an “agile” team. Your situation is unique. That’s why you need to be aware of the potential testing obstacles your team might face and how you can apply agile values and principles to overcome them."
Enjoy the book!
Happy testing and... make it green, becomes a dream :).
Labels
selenium
(20)
microsoft tools
(9)
continuous integration
(8)
performance
(7)
protractor
(7)
Applitools
(2)
Postman
(2)
agile
(2)
browser extensions
(2)
conferences
(2)
istqb
(2)
project management
(2)
specflow
(2)
autoit
(1)
browserstack
(1)
cypress
(1)
qa
(1)
sikuli
(1)
static testing
(1)
testing events
(1)
Monday, February 29, 2016
Wednesday, February 10, 2016
Bug Magnet - A 'nice to have' Chrome extension
Introduction
Bug Magnet it's an useful extension for testers that gives you the possibility of entering values for inputs in a web page and that can be helpful in your exploratory testing, via a right-click context menu.
How to Use it?
- valid/invalid emails
- sql injection
- html parsing
- numbers, etc
Happy testing and... make it green, becomes a dream :).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
Introduction Recently I've been asked by a blogger how can I use SpecFlow to write a test in Visual Studio. " I am a beginner i...
-
Introduction In this article we will transcribe the java code into c# for the following links: http://ralucasuditu-softwaretesting.blogsp...
-
How my Desktop looks like :)? This is an useful wall-chart from Rosetta Stone and Cookbook that covers popular technologies as XPath...